Jump to content
Wiki Home
EPrints Home
Bazaar
Files
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Front Page
EPrints 3 Manual
EPrints Training Course
EPrints Glossary
Installing EPrints
How-to Configure EPrints
EPrints 3.2+ API
EPrints 3 Reference
EPrints Plugins
Wiki
All categories
Recent changes
Main Page
Help
EPrints Documentation
Search
Search
Appearance
Log in
Request account
Personal tools
Log in
Request account
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
EPrints4 Roadmap
Page
Discussion
British English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
[[Category:Eprints4]] [[Category:Contribute]] Some general ideas for the development of the next major release of EPrints. Also read [[EPrints4_Status]] ==Main Objectives== * Separation of the Core API and UI (/rendering) components - that mainly means that core objects (Repository, MetaField*, DataObj*) won't have any render_* method. this could also imply that the core or the UI could be upgraded separately. It would also make re-use of the eprints core easy for other purposes (e.g. data repository, OER etc.) * Remove the spaghetti code (esp (1) rendering methods (2) Dataobj-Metafield relations) * Drop support for internal search in favour of specialist tools such as Xapian or Solr - we might however need to keep some aspects of the internal search (cf List/data retrieval) for exact matching - perhaps that's more a (SQL) "QueryBuilder" than a (user) search. * Drop support for Windows? * Implement object locking at the core level (for any objects, perhaps without using database fields at all). Actually this is done via: DB Transactions, ETag and If-None-Match headers. The current (3.2/3.3) object locking is a UI feature not a core one. * Implement object state at the core level (at the moment EPrint object might be in one of 4 states: inbox, buffer, archive, deletion via the field eprint_status) <DONE> * code normalisation: ** use new class name (e.g. EPrints::Session => EPrints::Repository) ** use "new way" of doing things (e.g. EPrints::Dataobj::X->new(12) => repo->dataset( 'x' )->dataobj(12)) ** remove v2.x features deprecated in v3+ (cf. EPrints::BackCompatibility) * define clear API for core functions (e.g. Database, object handling) and for UI purposes. The API must present a unique way of doing something. * It might be worth separating the code into 3 packages to ease the development: eprints4-core, eprints4-ir and eprints4-ir-ui. ==Core== * Revisit Apache request Handler aka Apache::Rewrite (lots of hard-coded paths, many obsolete paths) - URL handling should be done by Controllers called/prioritised via a trigger. <TESTED OK> * Remove EPrints::Session from anywhere in favour of EPrints::Repository * Test using memcached (http://code.google.com/p/memcached/) - Cache::Memcached::Fast to cache data objects, perhaps could work to cache XML fragments too. <TESTED OK> * Use Multipart rather than Compound - Compound creates 1 table per subfield whilst Multipart creates 1 column per subfield. <TESTED OK> * Finer grain permissions (using User, Groups, perhaps ACL concepts) - also security should be handled at the core level not at the UI level * Core should be able to run without IR extensions nor UI elements (might require to extend the SWORD layer for interactions with the core) <TESTED OK> * Built-in locking mechanisms for objects (improved edit_lock) * No hard-coded exceptions for IR extensions (e.g. eprint_status hard-coded in places) <TESTED OK> * Generalise concept of "files" to allow the storage of arbitrary files against any data objects (e.g. a profile picture for a User) <TESTED OK> * (coding-style) don't use objects via hash-value directly e.g. my $repo = $object->{repository} - use method instead: my $repo = $object->repository. * Metafield/DataObj::set_value should re-enforce the database type - i.e. $object->set_value( 'int_field', 'abc' )should fail at the Application layer - not silently at the DB layer as it currently happens. Same goes with any field type (e.g. ->set_value( 'set_field', 'invalid_set_value' ) should fail). <TESTED OK> * Extra dataset properties to allow global, consistent behaviour. Considered: "states", "revision" (TESTED OK), "lastmod" (TESTED OK), "read-only" (TESTED OK), "cache" (i.e. use memcached), "history" (keep revision history, implies revision=true), "datestamp", "acl" ==Extensions for IR-type of Repositories== * Authors/names stored in a separate dataset - should help integrate with various UID systems like OrcID. * Extra metadata to describe a User - cf. MePrints. ==UI elements== * jQuery over Prototype * jQueryUI widgets used to render fields * Javascript/Ajax concepts built-in * CSS3 Responsive design to support small screens (mobile, tablets etc) - http://alistapart.com/article/responsive-web-design * Consider http://getbootstrap.com/javascript/ - http://getbootstrap.com/components/ ==Misc== * an internal messaging system would be nice (similar to the current Message data object but with more options) - this would help system/user and user/user interactions. A logged-in user could then see messages and act accordingly. For instance: publication just went live, items have been imported from remote sources, user commented on a resource etc. ==Current Dev tasks (stuff in progress)== * Complex UI elements such as forms with validations - Currently using a mix of Mustache (server-side templates) and AngularJS (client-side) - btw some cool stuff here: http://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/ * (Deep) integration of Xapian into the core: ** but keeping it generic enough to allow other implementation of other search engines ** must find a way to (1) conduct a user search via Xapian and (2) merge the results with a DB-bound search to restrict to items that the user can effectively search (think ACL here) ** Must find a way to generate API pages from the code/POD
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to EPrints Documentation may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
EPrints Documentation:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)