Difference between revisions of "Web2.0"

From EPrints Documentation
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
* ULCC has the [http://sneep.ulcc.ac.uk/ SNEEP project] and the [http://www.linnean-online.org/ Linnaean society repository]. They have been developing comments and bookmarking facilities.
 
* ULCC has the [http://sneep.ulcc.ac.uk/ SNEEP project] and the [http://www.linnean-online.org/ Linnaean society repository]. They have been developing comments and bookmarking facilities.
 +
 +
* The [http://edspace.eprints.org EDSPACE project] is developing a user-centric approach to learning object repository.
 +
 +
* The [http://www.faroes.ecs.soton.ac.uk/index.php FARAOES project] are developing a repository user interface that follows the best-practice principles of Web 2.0 sites

Revision as of 16:39, 13 December 2007

Outcomes from the Web 2.0 Pow-wow 13th December 2007

User-centric approach to a web application. The accumulated data that such an approach gathers might be better managed in separate user area - the user has their own area of the database.

  • The Richtags project have produced a wonderful interface to multiple repositories to facilitate social interaction.
  • Connotea (Nature) already has an established EPrints user interface component
  • The EDSPACE project is developing a user-centric approach to learning object repository.
  • The FARAOES project are developing a repository user interface that follows the best-practice principles of Web 2.0 sites