Difference between revisions of "Web2.0"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* ULCC has the [http://sneep.ulcc.ac.uk/ SNEEP project] and the [http://www.linnean-online.org/ Linnaean society repository]. They have been developing comments and bookmarking facilities. | * ULCC has the [http://sneep.ulcc.ac.uk/ SNEEP project] and the [http://www.linnean-online.org/ Linnaean society repository]. They have been developing comments and bookmarking facilities. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The [http://edspace.eprints.org EDSPACE project] is developing a user-centric approach to learning object repository. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The [http://www.faroes.ecs.soton.ac.uk/index.php FARAOES project] are developing a repository user interface that follows the best-practice principles of Web 2.0 sites | ||
Revision as of 16:39, 13 December 2007
Outcomes from the Web 2.0 Pow-wow 13th December 2007
User-centric approach to a web application. The accumulated data that such an approach gathers might be better managed in separate user area - the user has their own area of the database.
- The Richtags project have produced a wonderful interface to multiple repositories to facilitate social interaction.
- Connotea (Nature) already has an established EPrints user interface component
- ULCC has the SNEEP project and the Linnaean society repository. They have been developing comments and bookmarking facilities.
- The EDSPACE project is developing a user-centric approach to learning object repository.
- The FARAOES project are developing a repository user interface that follows the best-practice principles of Web 2.0 sites
