Difference between revisions of "Web2.0"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
User-centric approach to a web application. The accumulated data that such an approach gathers might be better managed in separate user area - the user has their own area of the database. | User-centric approach to a web application. The accumulated data that such an approach gathers might be better managed in separate user area - the user has their own area of the database. | ||
| − | Richtags | + | * The [[Richtags project] http://beta.richtags.net/] have produced a wonderful interface to multiple repositories to facilitate social interaction. |
| − | Connotea (Nature) | + | * Connotea (Nature) already has an established EPrints user interface component |
| − | ULCC | + | * ULCC has the [[SNEEP project] http://sneep.ulcc.ac.uk/] and the [[Linnaean society repository] http://www.linnean-online.org/]. They have been developing comments and bookmarking facilities. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 16:31, 13 December 2007
Outcomes from the Web 2.0 Pow-wow 13th December 2007
User-centric approach to a web application. The accumulated data that such an approach gathers might be better managed in separate user area - the user has their own area of the database.
- The [[Richtags project] http://beta.richtags.net/] have produced a wonderful interface to multiple repositories to facilitate social interaction.
- Connotea (Nature) already has an established EPrints user interface component
- ULCC has the [[SNEEP project] http://sneep.ulcc.ac.uk/] and the [[Linnaean society repository] http://www.linnean-online.org/]. They have been developing comments and bookmarking facilities.
