Difference between revisions of "EPrints4 Roadmap"
m (Change category Developer to Contribute) |
|||
(21 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Some general ideas for the development of the next major release of EPrints. | + | [[Category:Eprints4]] |
+ | [[Category:Contribute]] | ||
+ | Some general ideas for the development of the next major release of EPrints. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also read [[EPrints4_Status]] | ||
==Main Objectives== | ==Main Objectives== | ||
− | * Separation of the Core API and UI (/rendering) components | + | * Separation of the Core API and UI (/rendering) components - that mainly means that core objects (Repository, MetaField*, DataObj*) won't have any render_* method. this could also imply that the core or the UI could be upgraded separately. It would also make re-use of the eprints core easy for other purposes (e.g. data repository, OER etc.) |
* Remove the spaghetti code (esp (1) rendering methods (2) Dataobj-Metafield relations) | * Remove the spaghetti code (esp (1) rendering methods (2) Dataobj-Metafield relations) | ||
Line 9: | Line 13: | ||
* Drop support for internal search in favour of specialist tools such as Xapian or Solr - we might however need to keep some aspects of the internal search (cf List/data retrieval) for exact matching - perhaps that's more a (SQL) "QueryBuilder" than a (user) search. | * Drop support for internal search in favour of specialist tools such as Xapian or Solr - we might however need to keep some aspects of the internal search (cf List/data retrieval) for exact matching - perhaps that's more a (SQL) "QueryBuilder" than a (user) search. | ||
− | * Drop support for Windows | + | * Drop support for Windows? |
− | * Implement object locking at the core level (for any objects, perhaps without using database fields at all) | + | * Implement object locking at the core level (for any objects, perhaps without using database fields at all). Actually this is done via: DB Transactions, ETag and If-None-Match headers. The current (3.2/3.3) object locking is a UI feature not a core one. |
+ | |||
+ | * Implement object state at the core level (at the moment EPrint object might be in one of 4 states: inbox, buffer, archive, deletion via the field eprint_status) <DONE> | ||
* code normalisation: | * code normalisation: | ||
Line 19: | Line 25: | ||
* define clear API for core functions (e.g. Database, object handling) and for UI purposes. The API must present a unique way of doing something. | * define clear API for core functions (e.g. Database, object handling) and for UI purposes. The API must present a unique way of doing something. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * It might be worth separating the code into 3 packages to ease the development: eprints4-core, eprints4-ir and eprints4-ir-ui. | ||
==Core== | ==Core== | ||
− | * Revisit Apache request Handler (lots of hard-coded paths, many obsolete paths) | + | * Revisit Apache request Handler aka Apache::Rewrite (lots of hard-coded paths, many obsolete paths) - URL handling should be done by Controllers called/prioritised via a trigger. <TESTED OK> |
* Remove EPrints::Session from anywhere in favour of EPrints::Repository | * Remove EPrints::Session from anywhere in favour of EPrints::Repository | ||
− | * Test using memcached (http://code.google.com/p/memcached/) - Cache::Memcached::Fast to cache data objects, perhaps could work to cache XML fragments too. | + | * Test using memcached (http://code.google.com/p/memcached/) - Cache::Memcached::Fast to cache data objects, perhaps could work to cache XML fragments too. <TESTED OK> |
− | * Use Multipart rather than Compound - Compound creates 1 table per subfield whilst Multipart creates 1 column per subfield. | + | * Use Multipart rather than Compound - Compound creates 1 table per subfield whilst Multipart creates 1 column per subfield. <TESTED OK> |
− | * Finer grain permissions (using User, Groups, perhaps ACL concepts) | + | * Finer grain permissions (using User, Groups, perhaps ACL concepts) - also security should be handled at the core level not at the UI level |
− | * Core should be able to run without IR extensions nor UI elements (might require to extend the SWORD layer for interactions with the core) | + | * Core should be able to run without IR extensions nor UI elements (might require to extend the SWORD layer for interactions with the core) <TESTED OK> |
* Built-in locking mechanisms for objects (improved edit_lock) | * Built-in locking mechanisms for objects (improved edit_lock) | ||
− | * No hard-coded exceptions for IR extensions (e.g. eprint_status hard-coded in places) | + | * No hard-coded exceptions for IR extensions (e.g. eprint_status hard-coded in places) <TESTED OK> |
+ | |||
+ | * Generalise concept of "files" to allow the storage of arbitrary files against any data objects (e.g. a profile picture for a User) <TESTED OK> | ||
− | * | + | * (coding-style) don't use objects via hash-value directly e.g. my $repo = $object->{repository} - use method instead: my $repo = $object->repository. |
+ | * Metafield/DataObj::set_value should re-enforce the database type - i.e. $object->set_value( 'int_field', 'abc' )should fail at the Application layer - not silently at the DB layer as it currently happens. Same goes with any field type (e.g. ->set_value( 'set_field', 'invalid_set_value' ) should fail). <TESTED OK> | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Extra dataset properties to allow global, consistent behaviour. Considered: "states", "revision" (TESTED OK), "lastmod" (TESTED OK), "read-only" (TESTED OK), "cache" (i.e. use memcached), "history" (keep revision history, implies revision=true), "datestamp", "acl" | ||
==Extensions for IR-type of Repositories== | ==Extensions for IR-type of Repositories== | ||
Line 46: | Line 59: | ||
* Extra metadata to describe a User - cf. MePrints. | * Extra metadata to describe a User - cf. MePrints. | ||
+ | |||
==UI elements== | ==UI elements== | ||
Line 54: | Line 68: | ||
* Javascript/Ajax concepts built-in | * Javascript/Ajax concepts built-in | ||
+ | |||
+ | * CSS3 Responsive design to support small screens (mobile, tablets etc) - http://alistapart.com/article/responsive-web-design | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Consider http://getbootstrap.com/javascript/ - http://getbootstrap.com/components/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Misc== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * an internal messaging system would be nice (similar to the current Message data object but with more options) - this would help system/user and user/user interactions. A logged-in user could then see messages and act accordingly. For instance: publication just went live, items have been imported from remote sources, user commented on a resource etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Current Dev tasks (stuff in progress)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Complex UI elements such as forms with validations - Currently using a mix of Mustache (server-side templates) and AngularJS (client-side) - btw some cool stuff here: http://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/ | ||
+ | * (Deep) integration of Xapian into the core: | ||
+ | ** but keeping it generic enough to allow other implementation of other search engines | ||
+ | ** must find a way to (1) conduct a user search via Xapian and (2) merge the results with a DB-bound search to restrict to items that the user can effectively search (think ACL here) | ||
+ | ** Must find a way to generate API pages from the code/POD |
Latest revision as of 23:53, 11 September 2018
Some general ideas for the development of the next major release of EPrints.
Also read EPrints4_Status
Contents
Main Objectives
- Separation of the Core API and UI (/rendering) components - that mainly means that core objects (Repository, MetaField*, DataObj*) won't have any render_* method. this could also imply that the core or the UI could be upgraded separately. It would also make re-use of the eprints core easy for other purposes (e.g. data repository, OER etc.)
- Remove the spaghetti code (esp (1) rendering methods (2) Dataobj-Metafield relations)
- Drop support for internal search in favour of specialist tools such as Xapian or Solr - we might however need to keep some aspects of the internal search (cf List/data retrieval) for exact matching - perhaps that's more a (SQL) "QueryBuilder" than a (user) search.
- Drop support for Windows?
- Implement object locking at the core level (for any objects, perhaps without using database fields at all). Actually this is done via: DB Transactions, ETag and If-None-Match headers. The current (3.2/3.3) object locking is a UI feature not a core one.
- Implement object state at the core level (at the moment EPrint object might be in one of 4 states: inbox, buffer, archive, deletion via the field eprint_status) <DONE>
- code normalisation:
- use new class name (e.g. EPrints::Session => EPrints::Repository)
- use "new way" of doing things (e.g. EPrints::Dataobj::X->new(12) => repo->dataset( 'x' )->dataobj(12))
- remove v2.x features deprecated in v3+ (cf. EPrints::BackCompatibility)
- define clear API for core functions (e.g. Database, object handling) and for UI purposes. The API must present a unique way of doing something.
- It might be worth separating the code into 3 packages to ease the development: eprints4-core, eprints4-ir and eprints4-ir-ui.
Core
- Revisit Apache request Handler aka Apache::Rewrite (lots of hard-coded paths, many obsolete paths) - URL handling should be done by Controllers called/prioritised via a trigger. <TESTED OK>
- Remove EPrints::Session from anywhere in favour of EPrints::Repository
- Test using memcached (http://code.google.com/p/memcached/) - Cache::Memcached::Fast to cache data objects, perhaps could work to cache XML fragments too. <TESTED OK>
- Use Multipart rather than Compound - Compound creates 1 table per subfield whilst Multipart creates 1 column per subfield. <TESTED OK>
- Finer grain permissions (using User, Groups, perhaps ACL concepts) - also security should be handled at the core level not at the UI level
- Core should be able to run without IR extensions nor UI elements (might require to extend the SWORD layer for interactions with the core) <TESTED OK>
- Built-in locking mechanisms for objects (improved edit_lock)
- No hard-coded exceptions for IR extensions (e.g. eprint_status hard-coded in places) <TESTED OK>
- Generalise concept of "files" to allow the storage of arbitrary files against any data objects (e.g. a profile picture for a User) <TESTED OK>
- (coding-style) don't use objects via hash-value directly e.g. my $repo = $object->{repository} - use method instead: my $repo = $object->repository.
- Metafield/DataObj::set_value should re-enforce the database type - i.e. $object->set_value( 'int_field', 'abc' )should fail at the Application layer - not silently at the DB layer as it currently happens. Same goes with any field type (e.g. ->set_value( 'set_field', 'invalid_set_value' ) should fail). <TESTED OK>
- Extra dataset properties to allow global, consistent behaviour. Considered: "states", "revision" (TESTED OK), "lastmod" (TESTED OK), "read-only" (TESTED OK), "cache" (i.e. use memcached), "history" (keep revision history, implies revision=true), "datestamp", "acl"
Extensions for IR-type of Repositories
- Authors/names stored in a separate dataset - should help integrate with various UID systems like OrcID.
- Extra metadata to describe a User - cf. MePrints.
UI elements
- jQuery over Prototype
- jQueryUI widgets used to render fields
- Javascript/Ajax concepts built-in
- CSS3 Responsive design to support small screens (mobile, tablets etc) - http://alistapart.com/article/responsive-web-design
Misc
- an internal messaging system would be nice (similar to the current Message data object but with more options) - this would help system/user and user/user interactions. A logged-in user could then see messages and act accordingly. For instance: publication just went live, items have been imported from remote sources, user commented on a resource etc.
Current Dev tasks (stuff in progress)
- Complex UI elements such as forms with validations - Currently using a mix of Mustache (server-side templates) and AngularJS (client-side) - btw some cool stuff here: http://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/
- (Deep) integration of Xapian into the core:
- but keeping it generic enough to allow other implementation of other search engines
- must find a way to (1) conduct a user search via Xapian and (2) merge the results with a DB-bound search to restrict to items that the user can effectively search (think ACL here)
- Must find a way to generate API pages from the code/POD