Difference between revisions of "Web2.0"

From EPrints Documentation
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
User-centric approach to a web application. The accumulated data that such an approach gathers might be better managed in  separate user area - the user has their own area of the database.
 
User-centric approach to a web application. The accumulated data that such an approach gathers might be better managed in  separate user area - the user has their own area of the database.
  
* The [[Richtags project] http://beta.richtags.net/] have produced a wonderful interface to multiple repositories to facilitate social interaction.
+
* The [http://beta.richtags.net/ Richtags project] have produced a wonderful interface to multiple repositories to facilitate social interaction.
  
 
* Connotea (Nature) already has an established EPrints user interface component
 
* Connotea (Nature) already has an established EPrints user interface component
  
* ULCC has the [[SNEEP project] http://sneep.ulcc.ac.uk/] and the [[Linnaean society repository] http://www.linnean-online.org/]. They have been developing comments and bookmarking facilities.
+
* ULCC has the [http://sneep.ulcc.ac.uk/ SNEEP project] and the [http://www.linnean-online.org/ Linnaean society repository]. They have been developing comments and bookmarking facilities.

Revision as of 16:34, 13 December 2007

Outcomes from the Web 2.0 Pow-wow 13th December 2007

User-centric approach to a web application. The accumulated data that such an approach gathers might be better managed in separate user area - the user has their own area of the database.

  • The Richtags project have produced a wonderful interface to multiple repositories to facilitate social interaction.
  • Connotea (Nature) already has an established EPrints user interface component