What Is EPrints - Revision history

Kgoetz: add categories

2018-09-12T00:42:53Z

add categories

Lac: /* Review */

2008-04-27T23:10:38Z

‎Review

Lac at 23:10, 27 April 2008

2008-04-27T23:10:19Z

Lac: /* ITunes Interface */

2008-04-27T23:09:22Z

‎ITunes Interface

Lac: /* Ongoing Review Conditions */

2008-04-27T22:54:09Z

‎Ongoing Review Conditions

Lac: /* Review Conditions */

2008-04-27T22:47:47Z

‎Review Conditions

Lac: /* Classification and Tagging */

2008-04-27T11:41:42Z

‎Classification and Tagging

Lac: /* Classification and Tagging */

2008-04-27T11:23:05Z

‎Classification and Tagging

Lac: /* Classification and Tagging */

2008-04-23T09:18:45Z

‎Classification and Tagging

Lac: /* Classification and Tagging */

2008-04-23T06:03:37Z

‎Classification and Tagging

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 12 September 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[Category: FAQ]]
		+	[[Category: Out of Date]]
		+
	Let's get away from the OAIS definitions and repository talk. Let's think about EPrints as an abstract information system. WHat features does it provide, so what classes of problem can it be used for?		Let's get away from the OAIS definitions and repository talk. Let's think about EPrints as an abstract information system. WHat features does it provide, so what classes of problem can it be used for?

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 == Review ==
 EPrints provides an editorial workflow for items that have been entered (see acquisition, above) to be checked, reviewed, commented on, modified, returned to the original depositor, moved to another reviewer, or placed into a final, published state. This facilitates simple peer review, editorial oversight or management authorisation for publishing, commentary or rights checking. EPrints has an extremely flexible editorial workflow that allows items that are requested for deposit to be passed to one or more editorial assistants, depending on the ''editorial scope'' that they have been assigned. Items can pass between different editors as different parts of the workflow are enacted. This means that a report can undergo copy-editing, copyright checks, IPR scrutiny and security analyses by a range of different people before it is allowed to appear in the public repository, or that a student PhD thesis can be signed off by the viva committee, the departmental teaching office and the library.
 == Dissemination and Publishing ==

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 == Review ==
-EPrints provides an editorial workflow for items that have been entered (see acquisition, above) to be checked, reviewed, commented on, modified, returned to the original depositor, moved to another reviewer, or placed into a final, published state. This facilitates simple peer review, editorial oversight or management authorisation for publishing, commentary or rights checking.
+EPrints provides an editorial workflow for items that have been entered (see acquisition, above) to be checked, reviewed, commented on, modified, returned to the original depositor, moved to another reviewer, or placed into a final, published state. This facilitates simple peer review, editorial oversight or management authorisation for publishing, commentary or rights checking. EPrints has an extremely flexible editorial workflow that allows items that are requested for deposit to be passed to one or more editorial assistants, depending on the ''editorial scope'' that they have been assigned. Items can pass between different editors as different parts of the workflow are enacted. This means that a report can undergo copy-editing, copyright checks, IPR scrutiny and security analyses by a range of different people before it is allowed to appear in the public repository, or that a student PhD thesis can be signed off by the viva committee, the departmental teaching office and the library.
 == Dissemination and Publishing ==
@@ Line 22: / Line 23: @@
 == ITunes Interface ==
 EPrints provides an ITunes-like, multicolumn interface for viewing selected attributes of a set of records taken from the repository. This allows an overall view of slices of the repository, and allows large numbers of records to be quickly compared and acted on. ''List some enabled use cases''

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 27 April 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:

	== ITunes Interface ==		== ITunes Interface ==
−	EPrints provides an ITunes-like, multicolumn interface for viewing selected attributes of a set of records taken from the repository. This allows an overall view of slices of the repository, and allows large numbers of records to be quickly compared.	+	EPrints provides an ITunes-like, multicolumn interface for viewing selected attributes of a set of records taken from the repository. This allows an overall view of slices of the repository, and allows large numbers of records to be quickly compared and acted on. ''List some enabled use cases''
		+
		+	== Editorial Workflow ==
		+	EPrints has an extremely flexible editorial workflow that allows items that are requested for deposit to be passed to one or more editorial assistants, depending on the ''editorial scope'' that they have been assigned. Items can pass between different editors as different parts of the workflow are enacted. This means that a report can undergo copy-editing, copyright checks, IPR scrutiny and security analyses by a range of different people before it is allowed to appear in the public repository, or that a student PhD thesis can be signed off by the viva committee, the departmental teaching office and the library.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 27 April 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:
	== Ongoing Review Conditions ==		== Ongoing Review Conditions ==
	The manager-defined quality issues allow live items in the repository to be monitored against phases in their ongoing lifecycles. For example, to make sure that a record about a project has been updated with the completion report, or a submitted journal article has been updated with the decision to publish, or that a user has updated their CV in the last 6 months, or that the full set of referee's comments have been entered for a paper in a workshop.		The manager-defined quality issues allow live items in the repository to be monitored against phases in their ongoing lifecycles. For example, to make sure that a record about a project has been updated with the completion report, or a submitted journal article has been updated with the decision to publish, or that a user has updated their CV in the last 6 months, or that the full set of referee's comments have been entered for a paper in a workshop.
		+
		+	== ITunes Interface ==
		+	EPrints provides an ITunes-like, multicolumn interface for viewing selected attributes of a set of records taken from the repository. This allows an overall view of slices of the repository, and allows large numbers of records to be quickly compared.

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 EPrints allows items to be tagged with controlled metadata from restricted vocabularies or taxonomies or with uncontrolled keywords or informal folksonomies. Its autocompletion facilities allow users to be [http://files.eprints.org/351/1/keyword-completion.png prompted with commonly used folk terms] to describe an item, and its keyword view styles [http://files.eprints.org/340/1/keyword-tagcloud.png allow tag clouds to be displayed].
-== Review Conditions ==
+== Ongoing Review Conditions ==
-The manager-defined quality issues allow live items to be checked against ongoing phases in their lifecycles. For example, to make sure that a funding proposal has been updated with the decision to support, or a submitted journal article has been updated with the decision to publish.
+The manager-defined quality issues allow live items in the repository to be monitored against phases in their ongoing lifecycles. For example, to make sure that a record about a project has been updated with the completion report, or a submitted journal article has been updated with the decision to publish, or that a user has updated their CV in the last 6 months, or that the full set of referee's comments have been entered for a paper in a workshop.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:41, 27 April 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== Classification and Tagging ==		== Classification and Tagging ==
	EPrints allows items to be tagged with controlled metadata from restricted vocabularies or taxonomies or with uncontrolled keywords or informal folksonomies. Its autocompletion facilities allow users to be [http://files.eprints.org/351/1/keyword-completion.png prompted with commonly used folk terms] to describe an item, and its keyword view styles [http://files.eprints.org/340/1/keyword-tagcloud.png allow tag clouds to be displayed].		EPrints allows items to be tagged with controlled metadata from restricted vocabularies or taxonomies or with uncontrolled keywords or informal folksonomies. Its autocompletion facilities allow users to be [http://files.eprints.org/351/1/keyword-completion.png prompted with commonly used folk terms] to describe an item, and its keyword view styles [http://files.eprints.org/340/1/keyword-tagcloud.png allow tag clouds to be displayed].
		+
		+	== Review Conditions ==
		+	The manager-defined quality issues allow live items to be checked against ongoing phases in their lifecycles. For example, to make sure that a funding proposal has been updated with the decision to support, or a submitted journal article has been updated with the decision to publish.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:23, 27 April 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:

	== Classification and Tagging ==		== Classification and Tagging ==
−	EPrints allows items to be tagged with controlled metadata from restricted vocabularies or taxonomies or with uncontrolled keywords or informal folksonomies. Its autocompletion facilities allow users to be ~~prompted with commonly used folk terms to describe an item (~~[http://files.eprints.org/351/1/keyword-completion.png ~~see example~~]), and its keyword view styles ~~allow tag clouds to be displayed (~~[http://files.eprints.org/340/1/keyword-tagcloud.png ~~see example~~]).	+	EPrints allows items to be tagged with controlled metadata from restricted vocabularies or taxonomies or with uncontrolled keywords or informal folksonomies. Its autocompletion facilities allow users to be [http://files.eprints.org/351/1/keyword-completion.png prompted with commonly used folk terms] to describe an item, and its keyword view styles [http://files.eprints.org/340/1/keyword-tagcloud.png allow tag clouds to be displayed].

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:18, 23 April 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:

	== Classification and Tagging ==		== Classification and Tagging ==
−	EPrints allows items to be tagged with controlled metadata from restricted vocabularies or taxonomies or with uncontrolled keywords or informal folksonomies. Its autocompletion facilities allow users to be prompted by commonly used ''folk'' terms to describe an item, and its keyword view styles allow tag clouds to be displayed ([http://files.eprints.org/340/1/keyword-tagcloud.png see example]).	+	EPrints allows items to be tagged with controlled metadata from restricted vocabularies or taxonomies or with uncontrolled keywords or informal folksonomies. Its autocompletion facilities allow users to be prompted with commonly used folk terms to describe an item ([http://files.eprints.org/351/1/keyword-completion.png see example]), and its keyword view styles allow tag clouds to be displayed ([http://files.eprints.org/340/1/keyword-tagcloud.png see example]).

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 23 April 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:

	== Classification and Tagging ==		== Classification and Tagging ==
−	EPrints allows items to be tagged with controlled metadata from restricted vocabularies or taxonomies or with uncontrolled keywords or informal folksonomies. Its autocompletion facilities allow users to be prompted by commonly used ''folk'' terms to describe an item, and its keyword view styles allow tag clouds to be displayed.	+	EPrints allows items to be tagged with controlled metadata from restricted vocabularies or taxonomies or with uncontrolled keywords or informal folksonomies. Its autocompletion facilities allow users to be prompted by commonly used ''folk'' terms to describe an item, and its keyword view styles allow tag clouds to be displayed ([http://files.eprints.org/340/1/keyword-tagcloud.png see example]).